Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, No. 16-1466, 585 U.S. ___ (2018), abbreviated Janus v.AFSCME, is a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court on US labor law, concerning the power of labor unions to collect fees from non-union members.
Communications Workers of America v. Beck, 487 U.S. 735 (1988), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that, in a union security agreement, unions are authorized by statute to collect from non-members only those fees and dues necessary to perform its duties as a collective bargaining representative. [1]
Detroit BoE, the Supreme Court of the United States permitted public-sector unions to charge non-members agency fees so that employees in the public sector could be required to pay for the costs of representation, even as they opted not to be a member, as long as these fees are not spent on the union's political or ideological agenda.
The Supreme Court Overturned A Ruling Requiring Non-Union Employes to Pay Fees to Unions. In June 2018, the Supreme Court ruled against a law that required non-union workers to pay “fair share ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
The Supreme Court's 1963 Financial Core ... agency fees have been litigated as "Fair Share Fees." ... the Supreme Court's ruling allows union-eligible workers to ...
Knox v. Service Employees International Union, 567 U.S. 298 (2012), is a United States constitutional law case. The United States Supreme Court held in a 7–2 decision that Dianne Knox and other non-members of the Service Employees International Union did not receive the required notice of a $12 million assessment the union charged them to raise money for the union's political fund.
The St. Louis-based 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld Traynor's decision, setting up the Supreme Court appeal. The Fed last year proposed cutting the current cap to 14.4 cents per transaction.