enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Constitution of California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_of_California

    California v. Anderson, 6 Cal. 3d 628. This noted that under California's state constitution a stronger protection applies than under the U.S. Constitution's Eighth Amendment; the former prohibits punishments that are "cruel or unusual", while the latter only prohibits punishments that are "cruel and unusual". The constitution also confers upon ...

  3. Category : Amendments to the Constitution of California

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Amendments_to_the...

    Failed amendments to the Constitution of California (24 P) Pages in category "Amendments to the Constitution of California" The following 30 pages are in this category, out of 30 total.

  4. 2004 California Proposition 59 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_California_Proposition_59

    Proposition 59 was approved by the State Legislature as Senate Constitutional Amendment 1 of the 2003–2004 Regular Session (Resolution Chapter 1, Statutes of 2004). It was adopted by the California State Senate by a vote of 34-0 and the State Assembly by 78-0. [1] It was then put to voters as a ballot proposition on 2 November 2004. It passed ...

  5. Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pruneyard_Shopping_Center...

    Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins, 447 U.S. 74 (1980), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision issued on June 9, 1980 which affirmed the decision of the California Supreme Court in a case that arose out of a free speech dispute between the Pruneyard Shopping Center in Campbell, California, and several local high school students (who wished to canvass signatures for a petition against United ...

  6. 1982 California Proposition 8 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1982_California_Proposition_8

    The U.S. Constitution takes priority over the California constitution so courts may still be obliged to exclude evidence under the federal Bill of Rights. In practice the law prevented the California courts from interpreting the state constitution so as to impose an exclusionary rule more strict than that required by the federal constitution. [3]

  7. Necessity (tort) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Necessity_(tort)

    Wegner sued the defendant, the City of Minneapolis for trespass. Wegner claimed that the City's actions constituted a "taking" of his property under principles similar to those outlined in the Fifth Amendment to the US Constitution : this was a taking of his private property for public use and so the City was required to compensate him for it.

  8. ‘Right to housing’ constitutional amendment clears a ...

    www.aol.com/news/housing-constitutional...

    COMMITTEE HEARS ‘RIGHT TO HOUSING’ CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. On Wednesday, ... California’s constitution currently enshrines several rights, including the right to own property and the right ...

  9. 1911 California Proposition 7 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1911_California_Proposition_7

    Proposition 7 was approved by the California Legislature on 20 February 1911. It was ratified by voters in a referendum held as part of a special election on 10 October. The amendment altered the state constitution by rewriting and adding a long set of provisions to Article 4, Section 1, which dealt with the legislature. As amended, the section ...