Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Usually, subject experts will publish in sources with greater levels of editorial control such as research journals, which should be preferred over blog entries if such sources are available. Blogs may be used in certain conditions as secondary sources on living persons; see WP:BLP.
A personal blog is always a self-published source. Here are examples of how different postings on the same blog could be classified: When the blog posting provides information about what the author cooked last night, it is a primary source for its subject matter. When the blog posting provides an analysis of an event that happened decades ...
A source is where the material comes from. For example, a source could be a book or a webpage. A source can be reliable or unreliable for the material it is meant to support. Some sources, such as unpublished texts and an editor's own personal experience, are prohibited.
Unless the source exercises editorial control, e-prints and conference abstracts should be considered to be self-published. The above questions can be used to consider the reliability of self-published scientific material. See the policy on self-published sources at WP:SPS. Many of them are also primary sources, which should be treated with ...
According to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, any material that is challenged or likely to be challenged must be accompanied by a reliable source.In general, the most reliable sources are (a) peer-reviewed journals and books published in university presses, followed by (b) university-level textbooks; then by (c) magazines, journals, and books published by respected publishing houses; then by ...
Is the author, or this work, cited in other reliable sources? In academic works? This is a rough indicator of post-publication peer review and acceptance. (Pro tips: if there is a DOI link, this will often show "where cited" for scientific publications. If it's a book, searching at Google Books (enclose the book title in quotes) can bring up ...
References from questionable, historical and "raw" sources are examples of auxiliary sources. References from the subject, or those close to the subject, are also examples of auxiliary sources. [5] A third-party source from one article may be treated as an auxiliary source in another, because the focus has changed. [6]
Sources that are reliable for some material are not reliable for other material. For instance, otherwise unreliable self-published sources are usually acceptable to support uncontroversial information about the source's author. You should always try to use the best possible source, particularly when writing about living people.