enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Pushdown automaton - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pushdown_automaton

    For each pushdown automaton one may construct a context-free grammar such that () = (). [5] The language of strings accepted by a deterministic pushdown automaton (DPDA) is called a deterministic context-free language. Not all context-free languages are deterministic.

  3. Deterministic pushdown automaton - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deterministic_pushdown...

    The two are not equivalent for the deterministic pushdown automaton (although they are for the non-deterministic pushdown automaton). The languages accepted by empty stack are those languages that are accepted by final state and are prefix-free: no word in the language is the prefix of another word in the language. [2] [3]

  4. Embedded pushdown automaton - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embedded_pushdown_automaton

    An embedded pushdown automaton or EPDA is a computational model for parsing languages generated by tree-adjoining grammars (TAGs). It is similar to the context-free grammar-parsing pushdown automaton, but instead of using a plain stack to store symbols, it has a stack of iterated stacks that store symbols, giving TAGs a generative capacity between context-free and context-sensitive grammars ...

  5. Deterministic context-free language - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deterministic_context-free...

    The notion of the DCFL is closely related to the deterministic pushdown automaton (DPDA). It is where the language power of pushdown automata is reduced to if we make them deterministic; the pushdown automata become unable to choose between different state-transition alternatives and as a consequence cannot recognize all context-free languages. [1]

  6. Context-free language - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Context-free_language

    The context-free nature of the language makes it simple to parse with a pushdown automaton. Determining an instance of the membership problem ; i.e. given a string w {\displaystyle w} , determine whether w ∈ L ( G ) {\displaystyle w\in L(G)} where L {\displaystyle L} is the language generated by a given grammar G {\displaystyle G} ; is also ...

  7. Context-free grammar - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Context-free_grammar

    A derivation of a string for a grammar is a sequence of grammar rule applications that transform the start symbol into the string. A derivation proves that the string belongs to the grammar's language. A derivation is fully determined by giving, for each step: the rule applied in that step; the occurrence of its left-hand side to which it is ...

  8. Greibach normal form - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greibach_normal_form

    This conversion can be used to prove that every context-free language can be accepted by a real-time (non-deterministic) pushdown automaton, i.e., the automaton reads a letter from its input every step. Given a grammar in GNF and a derivable string in the grammar with length n, any top-down parser will halt at depth n.

  9. Nested word - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nested_word

    Thus the language = {} cannot be accepted by a visibly pushdown automaton for any partition of , however there are pushdown automata accepting this language. If a language L {\displaystyle L} over a tagged alphabet Σ ^ {\displaystyle {\hat {\Sigma }}} is accepted by a deterministic visibly pushdown automaton, then L {\displaystyle L} is called ...