enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. List of academic databases and search engines - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_academic_databases...

    Descriptions of women's history collections from sources in the UK, as well as women's history websites. Free London Metropolitan University: Global Health [70] Public Health Specialist abstracting and indexing database dedicated to public health research and practice. Contains scientific records from 1973 to the present. Subscription CABI: HCI ...

  3. CRAAP test - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CRAAP_test

    The CRAAP test is a test to check the objective reliability of information sources across academic disciplines. CRAAP is an acronym for Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose. [1] Due to a vast number of sources existing online, it can be difficult to tell whether these sources are trustworthy to use as tools for research.

  4. Google Scholar - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Scholar

    Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines. . Released in beta in November 2004, the Google Scholar index includes peer-reviewed online academic journals and books, conference papers, theses and dissertations, preprints, abstracts, technical reports, and other ...

  5. Wikipedia:Verifiability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability

    The publication (for example, the newspaper, journal, magazine: "That source covers the arts.") and publications like them ("A newspaper is not a reliable source for medical claims"). The publisher of the work (for example, Cambridge University Press : "That source publishes reference works.") and publishers like them ("An academic publisher is ...

  6. Wikipedia:How to increase Wikipedia's credibility - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:How_to_increase...

    The following research by political scientist Sverrir Steinsson, published in the American Political Science Review, lays out some facts about Wikipedia's credibility: . A qualitative content analysis shows that Wikipedia transformed from a dubious source of information in its early years to an increasingly reliable one over time.

  7. Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources

    How accepted and high-quality reliable sources use a given source provides evidence, positive or negative, for its reliability and reputation. The more widespread and consistent this use is, the stronger the evidence.

  8. For instance, otherwise unreliable self-published sources are usually acceptable to support uncontroversial information about the source's author. You should always try to use the best possible source, particularly when writing about living people. These are general guidelines, but the topic of reliable sources is a complicated one, and is ...

  9. Wikipedia:Academic use - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Academic_use

    Wikipedia is not a reliable source for academic writing or research. Wikipedia is increasingly used by people in the academic community, from first-year students to distinguished professors, as an easily accessible tertiary source for information about anything and everything and as a quick "ready reference", to get a sense of a concept or idea.