enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:Blogs as sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Blogs_as_sources

    "Self-published blogs" in this context refers to personal and group blogs (see: WP:BLP#Sources and WP:BLP#Using the subject as a self-published source). Note that otherwise reliable news sources--for example, the website of a major news organization--that happens to publish in a "blog" style format for some or all of its content may be ...

  3. Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources

    Wikipedia articles should be based mainly on reliable secondary sources, i.e., a document or recording that relates to or discusses information originally presented elsewhere. Reputable tertiary sources, such as introductory-level university textbooks, almanacs, and encyclopedias, may be cited.

  4. Wikipedia:Reliable source examples - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_source...

    Usually, subject experts will publish in sources with greater levels of editorial control such as research journals, which should be preferred over blog entries if such sources are available. Blogs may be used in certain conditions as secondary sources on living persons; see WP:BLP .

  5. Wikipedia talk:Reliable sources/Archive 11 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Reliable...

    Undent* Source-based research is not original research. Original research does not mean "I read a blog which said this and another blog said that." That is source-based research. Original research involves the creation of statements, not merely finding them somewhere. Also trivial analysis is not original research. Wjhonson 19:07, 23 January ...

  6. Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/...

    For a source to be added to this list, editors generally expect two or more significant discussions about the source's reliability in the past, or an uninterrupted request for comment on the source's reliability that took place on the reliable sources noticeboard. For a discussion to be considered significant, most editors expect no fewer than ...

  7. Wikipedia:What is a reliable source? - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_is_a...

    A reliable source is one that presents a well-reasoned theory or argument supported by strong evidence. Reliable sources include scholarly, peer-reviewed articles or books written by researchers for students and researchers, which can be found in academic databases and search engines like JSTOR and Google Scholar.

  8. Wikipedia : Arguments to avoid on discussion pages

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arguments_to...

    Inclusion is based on objective evidence of whether sufficient reliable sources have already taken notice, not on subjective judgments of whether people will or should take notice in the future. Focusing on the objective evidence helps the discussion reach a logical conclusion; injecting your personal predictions does not.

  9. Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_source...

    The blog format is how most of these sites ... If the standard of a reliable source for popular music is the journalistic equivalent of ... based on the evidence) and ...