enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. List of patent claim types - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_patent_claim_types

    This is a list of special types of claims that may be found in a patent or patent application.For explanations about independent and dependent claims and about the different categories of claims, i.e. product or apparatus claims (claims referring to a physical entity), and process, method or use claims (claims referring to an activity), see Claim (patent), section "Basic types and categories".

  3. YouTube copyright issues - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube_copyright_issues

    He originally appealed but was denied as it is not YouTube, but the user claiming the content who has the final say over the appeal. He messaged YouTube to appeal, but YouTube said that they do not mediate copyright claims. [38] The claim was later removed, with Google terminating the claimant's YouTube channel and multi-channel network. [39]

  4. Content ID - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_ID

    If a YouTube user disagrees with a decision by Content ID, it is possible to fill in a form disputing the decision. [27] However, this claim is sent directly to the party that owns the supposed copyright, who has the final decision in the matter unless legal action is pursued. If the reporting party denies their claim, the channel receives a ...

  5. Patent claim - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent_claim

    Claims were recommended in published patents in the Third Patent Act (1836) and finally became mandatory in the Fourth Patent Act (1870). [7] However, even among patent legal systems in which the claims are used as the reference to decide the scope of protection conferred by a patent, the way the claims are used may vary substantially.

  6. List of United States patent law cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Claim reciting "50 to 100 Angstroms" prima facie obvious in view of prior art teaching that it should be no less than 100 Angstroms. State Street Bank v. Signature Financial Group - CAFC, 1998. Defined the scope of a business method patent. Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc. - Supreme Court, 1998. Determined what constituted being "on sale" for ...

  7. Inter partes review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inter_partes_review

    An inter partes review is used to challenge the patentability of one or more claims in a U.S. patent only on a ground that could be raised under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 or 103 (non-obviousness), and only on the basis of prior art consisting of patents or printed publications. [3]

  8. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  9. Akamai Techs., Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akamai_Techs.,_Inc._v...

    They assigned their rights in the patent to MIT, which granted an exclusive license to Akamai Technologies, Inc., a company that the inventors formed in 1998. [2] Drawing of the patented system involved in Akamai v. Limelight. The patent claims a method of delivering electronic data using a “content delivery network,” or “CDN.”