enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Logical consequence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_consequence

    Logical consequence is necessary and formal, by way of examples that explain with formal proof and models of interpretation. [1] A sentence is said to be a logical consequence of a set of sentences, for a given language , if and only if , using only logic (i.e., without regard to any personal interpretations of the sentences) the sentence must ...

  3. Material implication (rule of inference) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Material_implication_(rule...

    In propositional logic, material implication [1] [2] is a valid rule of replacement that allows a conditional statement to be replaced by a disjunction in which the antecedent is negated. The rule states that P implies Q is logically equivalent to not- P {\displaystyle P} or Q {\displaystyle Q} and that either form can replace the other in ...

  4. Affirming the consequent - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirming_the_consequent

    Example 1. One way to demonstrate the invalidity of this argument form is with a counterexample with true premises but an obviously false conclusion. For example: If someone lives in San Diego, then they live in California. Joe lives in California. Therefore, Joe lives in San Diego. There are many places to live in California other than San Diego.

  5. Modus tollens - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modus_tollens

    Every use of modus tollens can be converted to a use of modus ponens and one use of transposition to the premise which is a material implication. For example: If P, then Q. (premise – material implication) If not Q, then not P. (derived by transposition) Not Q. (premise) Therefore, not P. (derived by modus ponens)

  6. Paradoxes of material implication - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradoxes_of_material...

    In this example there is no possible situation in which the premises are true while the conclusion is false. Since there is no counterexample, the argument is valid. But one could construct an argument in which the premises are inconsistent.

  7. Hypothetical syllogism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypothetical_syllogism

    The reason for this is that these logics describe defeasible reasoning, and conditionals that appear in real-world contexts typically allow for exceptions, default assumptions, ceteris paribus conditions, or just simple uncertainty. An example, derived from Ernest W. Adams, [3] If Jones wins the election, Smith will retire after the election.

  8. 105 True or False Questions—Fun Facts To Keep You ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/lifestyle/105-true-false-questions...

    Answer: Falsepeople can survive about three days, on average, without water. 75. All of your taste buds are on your tongue. Answer: False – you also have taste buds in your nose and sinuses ...

  9. List of rules of inference - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_rules_of_inference

    13, then/if, Converse implication; 14, OR, Logical disjunction; 15, true, Tautology. Each logic operator can be used in an assertion about variables and operations, showing a basic rule of inference. Examples: