Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Pages in category "United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit cases" The following 32 pages are in this category, out of 32 total. This list may not reflect recent changes .
Established on December 10, 1869 by the Judiciary Act of 1869 as a circuit judgeship for the Sixth Circuit Reassigned to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit by the Judiciary Act of 1891: Jackson: TN: 1891–1893 Lurton: TN: 1893–1909 Knappen: MI: 1910–1924 Moorman: KY: 1925–1938 Hamilton: KY: 1938–1945 S ...
Pages in category "United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit" This category contains only the following page. This list may not reflect recent changes .
In Taylor v.City of Saginaw, et al., No. 17-2126 (6th Cir. 2019), [1] the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that the practice of “chalking” in which parking enforcement officers apply chalk to mark the tires of parked vehicles in order to track the duration of time for which those vehicles have been parked, constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment to the ...
Case history; Prior: White v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railroad Co., 364 F.3d 789 (6th Cir. 2004). Holding; The anti-retaliation provision (42 U. S. C. §2000e–3(a)) under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 does not confine the actions and harms it forbids to those that are related to employment or occur at the workplace.
Alerding v. Ohio High School Athletic Association, 779 F.2d 315 (6th Cir. 1985) [1] was a court case heard before the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit which held that the right to participate in interscholastic sports is not a fundamental privilege protected by the Privileges and Immunities Clause of the United States Constitution.
Pages in category "Judges of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit" The following 80 pages are in this category, out of 80 total. This list may not reflect recent changes .
United States v. Warshak, 631 F.3d 266 (6th Cir. 2010) is a criminal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit holding that government agents violated the defendant's Fourth Amendment rights by compelling his Internet service provider (ISP) to turn over his emails without first obtaining a search warrant based on probable cause.