Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Because it is a divergent series, it should be interpreted as a formal sum, an abstract mathematical expression combining the unit fractions, rather than as something that can be evaluated to a numeric value. There are many different proofs of the divergence of the harmonic series, surveyed in a 2006 paper by S. J. Kifowit and T. A. Stamps. [13]
The summation of an explicit sequence is denoted as a succession of additions. For example, summation of [1, 2, 4, 2] is denoted 1 + 2 + 4 + 2, and results in 9, that is, 1 + 2 + 4 + 2 = 9. Because addition is associative and commutative, there is no need for parentheses, and the result is the same irrespective of the order of the summands ...
2.1 Low-order polylogarithms. 2.2 Exponential function. 2.3 Trigonometric, inverse trigonometric, ... 7.2 Sum of reciprocal of factorials. 7.3 Trigonometry and ...
In mathematics, the infinite series 1 / 2 + 1 / 4 + 1 / 8 + 1 / 16 + ··· is an elementary example of a geometric series that converges absolutely. The sum of the series is 1.
In 2002, Jeffrey Lagarias proved [12] that the Riemann hypothesis is equivalent to the statement that + (), is true for every integer n ≥ 1 with strict inequality if n > 1; here σ(n) denotes the sum of the divisors of n.
Since a = n(n + 1)/2, these formulae show that for an odd power (greater than 1), the sum is a polynomial in n having factors n 2 and (n + 1) 2, while for an even power the polynomial has factors n, n + 1/2 and n + 1.
[2] Summation by parts is frequently used to prove Abel's theorem and Dirichlet's test . One can also use this technique to prove Abel's test : If ∑ n b n {\textstyle \sum _{n}b_{n}} is a convergent series , and a n {\displaystyle a_{n}} a bounded monotone sequence , then S N = ∑ n = 0 N a n b n {\textstyle S_{N}=\sum _{n=0}^{N}a_{n}b_{n ...
The first four partial sums of the series 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + ⋯.The parabola is their smoothed asymptote; its y-intercept is −1/12. [1]The infinite series whose terms ...