enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. List of scientific bodies explicitly rejecting intelligent design

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientific_bodies...

    Explanations or ways of knowing that invoke metaphysical, non-naturalistic or supernatural mechanisms, whether called "creation science," "scientific creationism," "intelligent design theory," "young earth theory," or similar designations, are outside the scope of science and therefore are not part of a valid science curriculum."

  3. Precautionary principle - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precautionary_principle

    For example, a government may decide to limit or restrict the widespread release of a medicine or new technology until it has been thoroughly tested. The principle acknowledges that while the progress of science and technology has often brought great benefit to humanity, it has also contributed to the creation of new threats and risks.

  4. Stephen C. Meyer - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_C._Meyer

    Meyer has co-edited Darwinism, Design, and Public Education (Michigan State University Press, 2000) with John Angus Campbell and co-edited Science and Evidence of Design in the Universe (Ignatius Press, 2000) with Michael J. Behe and William A. Dembski. In 2009, his book Signature in the Cell was released and in December of that year.

  5. Intelligent design and science - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_design_and_science

    The failure to follow the procedures of scientific discourse and the failure to submit work to the scientific community that withstands scrutiny have weighed against intelligent design being accepted as valid science. The intelligent design movement has not published a properly peer-reviewed article supporting ID in a scientific journal, and ...

  6. Scientific misconduct - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_misconduct

    It is the violation of scientific integrity: violation of the scientific method and of research ethics in science, including in the design, conduct, and reporting of research. A Lancet review on Handling of Scientific Misconduct in Scandinavian countries provides the following sample definitions, [1] reproduced in The COPE report 1999: [2]

  7. Why Darwin Matters - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_Darwin_Matters

    More generally, creationists employ the "God in the gaps" argument: any apparent gap in scientific knowledge is viewed as evidence of supernatural design rather than as an area in need of more scientific research. An example is Isaac Newton's "plane problem": the orbits of the planets all lie approximately in the same plane and Newton could not ...

  8. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  9. A Scientific Dissent from Darwinism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Scientific_Dissent_from...

    The Institute uses "A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism" as evidence to support its claim that evolution is disputed widely within the scientific community. [ 6 ] [ 27 ] [ 28 ] In 2002, Stephen C. Meyer , the founder of the Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture , presented the list as evidence to the Ohio Board of Education to ...