Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments Wednesday in a major case over transgender health care for minors.The case focuses on Tennessee's ban on the treatment for minors in the state. The ...
A federal appeals court struck down Nasdaq rules designed to encourage more diverse company boards, the latest defeat for DEI policies across corporate America. The decision handed down by nine ...
The court ruling is the latest setback for DEI, which is facing growing legal challenges. After the murder of George Floyd in 2020 forced a historic reckoning with race in America, ...
[11] [18] The government and families also pointed to the Supreme Court's decision in Bostock v. Clayton County (2020), which upheld that both sexual orientation and gender identity are protected classed covered by anti-discrimination laws under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [19]
Good morning! Last week, a Supreme Court decision lowered the bar required for workers to prove harm when it comes to filing employment discrimination claims.. Although the ruling in Muldrow v.St ...
Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims must ensure that the benefit-of-the-doubt rule in was properly applied during the claims process in order to satisfy , which directs the court to “take due account” of the Department of Veterans Affairs’ application of that rule. April 29, 2024
The 19th explains that the stakes in United States v. Skrmetti are even higher than most Americans realize. If the court rules to keep the ban on gender-affirming care in place, the consequences ...
Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. 644 (2020), was a landmark [1] United States Supreme Court civil rights decision in which the Court held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects employees against discrimination because of sexuality or gender identity.