Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Coca-Cola brand soft drinks are an American icon, from the fuzzy polar bear that serves as the company mascot to the 1971 "I'd Like To Buy the World a Coke" ad campaign. Atlanta, the birthplace of...
There are a lot of similarities between these two stocks, and picking the better investment may not be as easy as you'd think. Coca-Cola vs. PepsiCo: Which Stock Is Better for Dividend Investors ...
Coca-Cola enjoys the backing of Warren Buffett, but it has seen revenues slipping — posting year-over-year losses in each year since 2016. Pepsi, on the other hand, seems to have a better ...
The Cola wars are the long-time rivalry between soft drink producers The Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo, who have engaged in mutually-targeted marketing campaigns for the direct competition between each company's product lines, especially their flagship colas, Coca-Cola and Pepsi. Beginning in the late 1970s and into the 1980s, the competition ...
The main effect of stock splits is an increase in the liquidity of a stock: [3] there are more buyers and sellers for 10 shares at $10 than 1 share at $100. Some companies avoid a stock split to obtain the opposite strategy: by refusing to split the stock and keeping the price high, they reduce trading volume.
Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc., headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina, is the largest independent Coca-Cola bottler in the United States. [ 3 ] The company makes, sells and distributes Coca-Cola products along with other beverages, distributing to a market of 65 million people in 14 states. [ 4 ]
The major difference between Coca-Cola and PepsiCo is that the former focuses solely on beverages, and that's why I prefer it. A slimmer business allows it to operate more efficiently.
Historically, the two companies have shared similar dips and highs, depending on the soda pop market. If the price of Coca-Cola were to go up a significant amount while Pepsi stayed the same, a pairs trader would buy Pepsi stock and sell Coca-Cola stock, assuming that the two companies would later return to their historical balance point.