Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In signal processing, multidimensional discrete convolution refers to the mathematical operation between two functions f and g on an n-dimensional lattice that produces a third function, also of n-dimensions. Multidimensional discrete convolution is the discrete analog of the multidimensional convolution of functions on Euclidean space.
2D convolution with an M × N kernel requires M × N multiplications for each sample (pixel). If the kernel is separable, then the computation can be reduced to M + N multiplications. Using separable convolutions can significantly decrease the computation by doing 1D convolution twice instead of one 2D convolution. [2]
Example of dilation on a grayscale image using a 5x5 flat structuring element. The top figure demonstrates the application of the structuring element window to the individual pixels of the original image. The bottom figure shows the resulting dilated image. It is common to use flat structuring elements in morphological applications.
For example, atrous or dilated convolution [28] [29] expands the receptive field size without increasing the number of parameters by interleaving visible and blind regions. Moreover, a single dilated convolutional layer can comprise filters with multiple dilation ratios, [30] thus having a variable receptive field size.
An example of the 2D discrete wavelet transform that is ... can be viewed as a convolution of () with a dilated, reflected, and normalized version of the ...
In artificial neural networks, a convolutional layer is a type of network layer that applies a convolution operation to the input. Convolutional layers are some of the primary building blocks of convolutional neural networks (CNNs), a class of neural network most commonly applied to images, video, audio, and other data that have the property of uniform translational symmetry.
For example, convolution of digit sequences is the kernel operation in multiplication of multi-digit numbers, which can therefore be efficiently implemented with transform techniques (Knuth 1997, §4.3.3.C; von zur Gathen & Gerhard 2003, §8.2).
For example, when = and =, Eq.3 equals , whereas direct evaluation of Eq.1 would require up to complex multiplications per output sample, the worst case being when both and are complex-valued. Also note that for any given M , {\displaystyle M,} Eq.3 has a minimum with respect to N . {\displaystyle N.} Figure 2 is a graph of the values of N ...