Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
You are free: to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work; to remix – to adapt the work; Under the following conditions: attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
File change date and time: 17:02, 4 March 2013: Date and time of digitizing: 17:02, 4 March 2013: Software used: UnknownApplication: Conversion program: Bullzip PDF Printer / www.bullzip.com / Freeware Edition: Encrypted: no: Page size: 595 x 842 pts (A4) Version of PDF format: 1.5
To request a Peer review, edit the article talk page, add {} to the top of the page, and save the page. This will create this template ({{Peer review}}) with a link to a new peer review page for the article. Follow this link, and add your request in the edit box as instructed.
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate; Pages for logged out editors learn more
Peer review. Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects:
If you use this template and populate it with info pulled from Wikidata, it will not format the author list in a way compatible with {{{vauthors}}}. Rather than have each use of the template raise an error, this template uses the {{{authors}}} instead. Unfortunately, the use of this parameter is discouraged because it does not contribute to a ...
This is automatically included within new reviews because it is linked within Template:PR/subst.. It provides links to the article and talk page by calling {{}}.It also includes a link to the most recent review, and also a link to let the reader watch the peer review page
This template should be used when the article appears to have been written by a reviewer on behalf of the subject of the article, or having some connection with the subject. It is used when the article is not necessarily representing a blatant opinion or opinion piece, but is still overly judgemental in tone.