enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Structure of policy debate - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structure_of_policy_debate

    Some arguments are never new, like certain forms of extrapolation from 1AR arguments and impact calculus (although many judges prefer it earlier in the round). The 2AR will almost never present new pieces of evidence but often will refer to pieces of evidence read earlier in the round by their citation, especially if the affirmative wants the ...

  3. Case (policy debate) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case_(policy_debate)

    The case is a form of on-topic debate and can also be referred to as C if done in the standard way C is a very effective way to win a case. The case is generally organized into sections called "observations" or "contentions", with advantages attached to the link or link break.

  4. Glossary of policy debate terms - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossary_of_policy_debate...

    Constructive speeches are each followed by a 3-minute cross-examination period. In high school, constructive speeches are 8 minutes long; in college, they are 9 minutes. In general, constructive arguments are the only time that a team can make new arguments. The last four speeches of the debate are reserved for refutations of arguments already ...

  5. Policy debate - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Policy_debate

    It is also referred to as cross-examination debate (sometimes shortened to Cross-X or CX) because of the 3-minute questioning period following each constructive speech. Evidence presentation is a crucial part of policy debate. The main argument being debated during a round is to change or not change the status quo.

  6. Free period products in schools among Girlguiding requests ...

    www.aol.com/free-period-products-schools-among...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  7. Topicality (policy debate) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topicality_(policy_debate)

    Topicality is a resolution issue in policy debate which pertains to whether or not the plan affirms the resolution as worded. [1] To contest the topicality of the affirmative, the negative interprets a word or words in the resolution and argues that the affirmative does not meet that definition, that the interpretation is preferable, and that non-topicality should be a voting issue.

  8. Is gnocchi healthier than pasta? It depends on 2 things ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/gnocchi-healthier-pasta-depends-2...

    Of course, if you're going out to eat once in a while and choosing between traditional pasta and gnocchi on a menu, simply pick whichever you prefer, Soans says. "Choose the one you enjoy more ...

  9. Parliamentary style debate - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliamentary_style_debate

    Parliamentary style debate, colloquially oftentimes just Parliamentary debate, is a formal framework for debate used in debating societies, academic debate events and competitive debate. It has its roots in parliamentary procedure and develops differently in different countries as a result.