Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Supreme Court of the United States handed down sixteen per curiam opinions during its 2017 term, which began October 2, 2017, and concluded September 30, 2018. [1] ...
Officer Kisela decided to fire four shots toward Hughes and she was later treated for non-life-threatening injuries. It was later discovered that Hughes had a history of mental illness. Hughes filed a lawsuit against Officer Kisela, claiming excessive use of force and a violation of her Fourth Amendment right.
Redirect to: 2017 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States#Kisela v. Hughes
Appointment history Agreement with judgment Opinions filed Seniority Name President Date confirmed % # Total Chief Justice: John Roberts: George W. Bush: September 29, 2005 93.3% 70/75 6 1 0 4 11 Associate Justice: Anthony Kennedy: Ronald Reagan: February 18, 1988 91.9% 68/74 6 5 0 2 13 Associate Justice: Clarence Thomas: George H. W. Bush ...
Andrew Kisela, a Tucson police officer, shot Hughes less than a minute after arriving with other police officers to a report of a woman erratically hacking a tree with a knife. Hughes was in possession of a large kitchen knife, had taken steps towards her roommate, and had refused to drop the knife when repeatedly told to do so.
Amy Hughes can refer to: Amy Hughes (administrator), British nursing administrator; Amy Hughes (artist), British contemporary artist; Amy Hughes (runner), British marathon runner; Amy Hughes, woman shot by police in Tucson, Arizona, leading to US Supreme Court case Kisela v. Hughes
In 1874, the U.S. government created the United States Reports, and retroactively numbered older privately-published case reports as part of the new series. As a result, cases appearing in volumes 1–90 of U.S. Reports have dual citation forms; one for the volume number of U.S. Reports, and one for the volume number of the reports named for the relevant reporter of decisions (these are called ...
Hughes, 258 U.S. 126 (1922), and Leser v. Garnett , 258 U.S. 130 (1922) , are a pair of cases regarding the Nineteenth Amendment . The Court ruled that Fairchild, as a private citizen, lacked standing to challenge the amendment's ratification under the limitations of the Case or Controversy Clause of Article III . [ 2 ]