enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Why Saia Stock Jumped 16% in September - AOL

    www.aol.com/why-saia-stock-jumped-16-215000322.html

    Later in the month, Susquehanna raised its price target on Saia to $585, implying an upside of 30% in the stock as it said a lack of price war in the industry would benefit the company even though ...

  3. Saia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saia

    Saia is an American less than truckload (LTL) trucking company that originated in Houma, Louisiana, in 1924.With original operation occurring in Louisiana and Texas for the first fifty years, expansion came after 1980 when coverage began reaching into more states within the South.

  4. Yellow Corporation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_Corporation

    In December 2023, 17 terminals of Yellow Corporation were sold to former subsidiary Saia in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy sale for $235.7 million. [52] On December 12, 2023, XPO, Inc. got approval to acquire 28 service centers of Yellow Corporation as a part of Chapter 11 bankruptcy for $870 million. [53] [54]

  5. Get breaking news and the latest headlines on business, entertainment, politics, world news, tech, sports, videos and much more from AOL

  6. Discover the latest breaking news in the U.S. and around the world — politics, weather, entertainment, lifestyle, finance, sports and much more.

  7. The 3-year US freight recession may finally be ending - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/3-us-freight-recession-may...

    A yearslong recession in the freight market may be ending as the industry returns to growth in 2025. Bank of America said its proprietary truck demand indicator is at its highest level since April ...

  8. Stay updated with breaking news, politics, sports, and the latest headlines on AOL.com.

  9. Saia v. New York - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saia_v._New_York

    Saia v. New York, 334 U.S. 558 (1948), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that an ordinance which prohibited the use of sound amplification devices except with permission of the Chief of Police was unconstitutional on its face because it established a prior restraint on the right of free speech in violation of the First Amendment.