Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Similarity is closely related to Bryne's social psychology model of interpersonal attraction (1961) which is determined by four variables: propinquity (how our environment and situation play a role in determining how often and to what degree we come in contact), need for affiliation, overt stimulus characteristics (refers to the observable ...
It is often compared to interactional synchrony and other social contagion effects, including verbal, facial, emotional and behavioral mimicry with similar emotional and attitudinal convergence. Facial Mimicry defined is the resemblance shown by one animal species to another which protects it from predators, perceived or otherwise.
The substantial similarity standard is used for all kinds of copyrighted subject matter: books, photographs, plays, music, software, etc. It may also cross media, as in Rogers v. Koons, where a sculptor was found to have infringed on a photograph. [1] [page needed] Substantial similarity is a question of fact that is decided by a jury.
In psychology, there are many cognitive distortions that can affect our perception, thinking, and decision making. The following are some of the most well-known cognitive distortions: 1. Confirmation bias - the tendency to seek, interpret, and memorize information in a way that confirms existing beliefs. 2.
Laws of association in Aristotle's psychology. Impressions are stored in the seat of perception, linked by the laws of similarity, contrast, and contiguity.. In psychology, the principal laws of association are contiguity, repetition, attention, pleasure-pain, and similarity.
While the New York courts now appear comfortable deciding substantial similarity as a matter of law in copyright cases, it awaits to be seen whether similar implied-in-fact contract claims will ...
When promoting candidates, a hiring manager may promote someone who shares a similar hobby, such as golf, over other qualified candidates. [6] Though affinity bias may lead to unfair hiring and promotion practices, it can also serve to increase mentorship and endorsement such as through women's empowerment .
The hypothesis is derived from the discipline of social psychology and was first proposed by American social psychologist Elaine Hatfield and her colleagues in 1966. [ 2 ] Successful couples of differing physical attractiveness may be together due to other matching variables that compensate for the difference in attractiveness. [ 3 ]