enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Burstyn,_Inc._v._Wilson

    Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson, 343 U.S. 495 (1952), also referred to as the Miracle Decision, was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that largely marked the decline of motion picture censorship in the United States. [1]

  3. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cipollone_v._Liggett_Group...

    Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., 505 U.S. 504 (1992), was a United States Supreme Court case. In a split opinion, the Court held that the Surgeon General's warning did not preclude lawsuits by smokers against tobacco companies on the basis of several claims.

  4. Disbarred SoCal attorney lied about having cancer, gambled ...

    www.aol.com/news/disbarred-socal-attorney-lied...

    A disbarred Manhattan Beach attorney lied about having terminal cancer, stole $117,000 in client funds to support a gambling habit, officials said.

  5. Supreme Court of the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_the...

    The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the highest court in the federal judiciary of the United States. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all U.S. federal court cases, and over state court cases that turn on questions of U.S. constitutional or federal law.

  6. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cruzan_v._Director...

    In a 5–4 decision, the Court affirmed the earlier ruling of the Supreme Court of Missouri and ruled in favor of the State of Missouri, finding it was acceptable to require "clear and convincing evidence" of a patient's wishes for removal of life support. A significant outcome of the case was the creation of advance health directives.

  7. Early divisions signal bitter internal conflicts as Supreme ...

    www.aol.com/early-divisions-signal-bitter...

    The Supreme Court earlier this month tossed out an appeal from anti-abortion doctors challenging expanded access to the abortion pill mifepristone. In March, it ruled that states couldn’t yank ...

  8. Moore v. Regents of the University of California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore_v._Regents_of_the...

    Regents of the University of California was a landmark Supreme Court of California decision. Filed on July 9, 1990, it dealt with the issue of property rights to one's own cells taken in samples by doctors or researchers. In 1976, John Moore was treated for hairy cell leukemia by physician David Golde, a cancer researcher at the UCLA Medical ...

  9. Hustler Magazine v. Falwell - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hustler_Magazine_v._Falwell

    Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell, 485 U.S. 46 (1988), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that parodies of public figures, even those intending to cause emotional distress, are protected by the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.