enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Who's Afraid of Peer Review? - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who's_Afraid_of_Peer_Review?

    SAGE Publications, which also accepted a fake paper, was put "under review" for 6 months. [19] Sage announced in a statement that it was reviewing the journal that accepted the fake paper, but that it would not shut it down. [20] Sage's membership was reinstated at the end of the review period following changes to the journal's editorial ...

  3. One Tech Tip: How to spot AI-generated deepfake images - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/one-tech-tip-spot-ai-052451355.html

    These fake images might seem harmless. But they can be used to carry out scams and identity theft or propaganda and election manipulation. Here is how to avoid being duped by deepfakes:

  4. List of topics characterized as pseudoscience - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_topics...

    Similar to the dihydrogen monoxide hoax, the scam takes advantage of the consumer's limited knowledge of chemistry, physics and physiology. Homeopathy – the belief that a patient with symptoms of an illness can be treated with extremely dilute remedies that are thought to produce those same symptoms in healthy people.

  5. AP Chemistry - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AP_Chemistry

    The 2014 AP Chemistry exam was the first administration of a redesigned test as a result of a redesigning of the AP Chemistry course. The exam format is now different from the previous years, with 60 multiple choice questions (now with only four answer choices per question), 3 long free response questions, and 4 short free response questions.

  6. Predatory publishing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predatory_publishing

    "Think. Check. Submit." poster by an international initiative to help researchers avoid predatory publishing. Predatory publishing, also write-only publishing [1] [2] or deceptive publishing, [3] is an exploitative academic publishing business model, where the journal or publisher prioritizes self-interest at the expense of scholarship.

  7. Pseudoscience - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudoscience

    An example of this transformation is the science of chemistry, which traces its origins to the pseudoscientific or pre-scientific study of alchemy. The vast diversity in pseudosciences further complicates the history of science. Some modern pseudosciences, such as astrology and acupuncture, originated before the scientific era.

  8. Snopes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snopes

    In 1994, [8] [9] [10] David and Barbara Mikkelson created an urban folklore web site that would become Snopes.com. Snopes was an early online encyclopedia focused on urban legends, which mainly presented search results of user discussions based at first on their contributions to the Usenet newsgroup alt.folklore.urban (AFU) where they'd been active. [11]

  9. Scholarly peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholarly_peer_review

    Impartial review, especially of work in less narrowly defined or inter-disciplinary fields, may be difficult to accomplish, and the significance (good or bad) of an idea may never be widely appreciated among its contemporaries. Peer review is generally considered necessary to academic quality and is used in most major scholarly journals.