enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Viacom International Inc. v. YouTube, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viacom_International_Inc...

    The employee data was later used in filings by both sides, because in some cases employees of the entertainment firms had uploaded their companies' content to YouTube voluntarily. Viacom cited internal e-mails sent among YouTube's founders discussing how to deal with clips uploaded to YouTube that were obviously the property of major media ...

  3. YouTube copyright issues - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube_copyright_issues

    He originally appealed but was denied as it is not YouTube, but the user claiming the content who has the final say over the appeal. He messaged YouTube to appeal, but YouTube said that they do not mediate copyright claims. [38] The claim was later removed, with Google terminating the claimant's YouTube channel and multi-channel network. [39]

  4. Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equals_Three,_LLC_v._Jukin...

    On May 1, 2014, Equals Three alleged that Jukin has filed at least 41 copyright infringement claims against them on YouTube, preventing them from earn advertising revenue from the affected episodes. Equals Three's inability to advertise allowed Jukin to place advertisements on the episodes, redirecting viewers to Jukin’s own YouTube channel.

  5. Lenz v. Universal Music Corp. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenz_v._Universal_Music_Corp.

    Universal Music Corp., 801 F.3d 1126 (9th Cir. 2015), is a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, holding that copyright owners must consider fair use defenses and good faith activities by alleged copyright infringers before issuing takedown notices for content posted on the Internet.

  6. List of copyright case law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_copyright_case_law

    Note: if no court name is given, according to convention, the case is from the Supreme Court of the United States.Supreme Court rulings are binding precedent across the United States; Circuit Court rulings are binding within a certain portion of it (the circuit in question); District Court rulings are not binding precedent, but may still be referred to by other courts.

  7. YouTube and privacy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube_and_privacy

    They also noted that according to YouTube, a lack of targeted ads could reduce a video's revenue, and that the lack of social features might impact the ability for their videos to receive promotion. [12] [13] Videos marked as "made for kids" were also excluded from Google search engine results, further lowering revenue for content creators. [14]

  8. YouTube copyright strike - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube_copyright_strike

    YouTube's own practice is to issue a "YouTube copyright strike" on the user accused of copyright infringement. [1] When a YouTube user gets hit with a copyright strike, they are required to watch a warning video about the rules of copyright and take trivia questions about the danger of copyright. [2] A copyright strike will expire after 90 days.

  9. Category:YouTube legal issues - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:YouTube_legal_issues

    Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Help; Learn to edit; Community portal; Recent changes; Upload file