Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
2017 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States#Kisela v. Hughes; Retrieved from " ...
Summary judgment granted, 143 F. Supp. 3d 609 (E.D. Mich. 2015); aff'd in part, 854 F. 3d 877 (6th Cir. 2017) Full text of the opinion: official slip opinion · Justia
Format links to a number of common caselaw sources Template parameters [Edit template data] Parameter Description Type Status Case case name of legal case, possibly including wikitext citation Example ''Brown v. Board of Education'', {{ussc|347|483|1954|el=no}} String required Cornell LII link cornell URL on Legal Information Institute at Cornell Law School Example https://www.law.cornell.edu ...
Fulton v. City of Philadelphia , 593 U.S. 522 (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that the City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania violated First Amendment rights of a Catholic foster care agency by refusing to renew the agency's contract unless it agreed to certify married same-sex couples as foster parents.
The literary contest became essential to the promotion of the Harlem Renaissance's writers and artists. The May 1925 issue of Opportunity lists a number of prizewinners who went on to enjoy successful publishing careers: Claude McKay, Zora Neale Hurston, Langston Hughes, Countee Cullen, Sterling Brown, and Franklin Frazier. From 1925 to 1927 ...
First National Bank of Montgomery v. Jerome Daly, Dec. 9, 1968 (Justice Court, Credit River Township, Scott County, Minnesota), also known as the Credit River Case, was a case tried before a justice of the peace in Minnesota in 1968. The case is not a Supreme Court case or an appeals court case, and does not set a legal precedent.
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court. Written by Associate Justice William Rehnquist , the decision of the Court held that a party moving for summary judgment need show only that the opposing party lacks evidence sufficient to support its case.
Octane Fitness, arguing that their elliptical products did not infringe ICON's patent, won on summary judgment and later moved for reimbursement for their attorney's fees. The district court denied the motion for attorney's fees, stating that even though Octane Fitness eventually prevailed, ICON's claims were not objectively baseless, [ 1 ] : 5 ...