Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Supreme Court held that the Illinois law was unconstitutional under the Commerce clause, technically the Dormant Commerce Clause.. In Bibb v.Navajo Freight Lines, 359 U.S. 520, 524 (1959), the Supreme Court stated:
The Illinois Compiled Statutes (ILCS) are the codified statutes of a general and permanent nature of Illinois. [1] [2] The compilation organizes the general Acts of Illinois into 67 chapters arranged within 9 major topic areas. [3] The ILCS took effect in 1993, replacing the previous numbering scheme generally known as the Illinois Revised ...
The amendment added Article I, Section 8.1 to the Illinois Constitution of 1970, which read: Section 8.1: Crime Victim's Rights: a) Crime victims, as defined by law, shall have the following rights as provided by law: 1) The right to be treated with fairness and respect for their dignity and privacy throughout the criminal justice process.
Scott v. Illinois, 440 U.S. 367 (1979), was a case heard by the Supreme Court of the United States. In Scott, the Court decided whether the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments required Illinois to provide Scott with trial counsel. To emphasize the importance of court-appointed counsel, the Court opined, "[T]he interest protected by the right to ...
These legislative acts are published in the official Laws of Illinois and are called "session laws". [1] [2] The Illinois Compiled Statutes (ILCS) are the codified statutes of a general and permanent nature. [2] [3] The Illinois Legislative Reference Bureau (LRB) makes additions, deletions, and changes to ILCS. [4] There is no official version ...
Attachment is a legal process by which a court of law, at the request of a creditor, designates specific property owned by the debtor to be transferred to the creditor, or sold for the benefit of the creditor. [1] A wide variety of legal mechanisms are employed by debtors to prevent the attachment of their assets.
Civil cases appealed from the Illinois Appellate Court are heard by the Supreme Court of Illinois upon the grant of a Petition for Leave to Appeal under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 315, [5] a Certificate of Importance under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 316, [6] or a Petition for Appeal as a Matter of Right under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 317. [7]
Second, it helps prevent arbitrary enforcement of the laws and arbitrary prosecutions. [2] The void for vagueness doctrine developed because, "When Congress does not set minimum guidelines to govern law enforcement, there is no limit to the conduct that can be criminalized." [5]: 1303 Grayned v. City of Rockford, 408 U.S. 104, 391 (1972):