Ads
related to: pros and cons of prologues of the bible text file pdf version free
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The prologues are, however, of no value as a historical source for the evangelists' backgrounds. They rely on the biblical text itself and various unreliable traditions as sources. [6] The earlier anti-Marcionite prologue to Luke was a source, but not the other two anti-Marcionite prologues. [7]
The anti-Marcionite prologues are three short prefaces to the gospels of Mark, Luke and John. No prologue to Matthew is known. They were originally written in Greek, but only the prologue to Luke survives in the original language. All three were translated into Latin and are preserved in some 40 manuscripts of the Vulgate Bible. [2]
The exclusive use of the King James Version is recorded in a statement made by the Tennessee Association of Baptists in 1817, stating "We believe that any person, either in a public or private capacity who would adhere to, or propagate any alteration of the New Testament contrary to that already translated by order of King James the 1st, that is now in common in use, ought not to be encouraged ...
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate
English: The Literal Standard Version is a complete, formal equivalence, idiomatically-literal English translation of The Holy Bible based on the Masoretic Text, Septuagint, and Dead Sea Scrolls in the Old Testament and the Textus Receptus and Majority Text in the New Testament.
This file contains additional information, probably added from the digital camera or scanner used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details may not fully reflect the modified file.
Ads
related to: pros and cons of prologues of the bible text file pdf version free