Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
[44] [45] Example: if Goa has collected a total GST revenue (intra state transaction - seller and buyer both are located in same state) of ₹ 100 million (US$1.2 million) in January, then the share of central government (CGST) will be ₹ 50 million (US$580,000) and the remaining ₹ 50 million (US$580,000) will be a share of Goa's state ...
Jackie Robinson's #42 shirt, which he wore when he broke Major League Baseball's 20th-century color line and throughout his Hall of Fame career with the Brooklyn Dodgers, is the subject of two such grandfather clauses. In 1997, MLB prohibited all teams from issuing #42 in the future; current players wearing #42 were allowed to continue to do so.
CGST may refer to: China Graduate School of Theology; Chinese Giant Solar Telescope; Central Goods and Services Tax This page was last edited on 28 ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
For example, 42 C.F.R. § 260.11(a)(1) would indicate "title 42, part 260, section 11, paragraph (a)(1)." Conversationally, it would be read as "forty-two C F R two-sixty point eleven a one" or similar. While new regulations are continually becoming effective, the printed volumes of the CFR are issued once each calendar year, on this schedule:
National examples of the licentiate are listed at licentiate (degree) A licentiate is an academic degree that traditionally conferred the license to teach at a university or to practice a particular profession. The term survived despite the fact that nowadays a doctorate is typically needed in order to teach at a university. The term is also ...
Expulsions under 42 U.S.C. 265 (Title 42 expulsions) from the southwest U.S. border [1] A Title 42 expulsion is the removal by the U.S. government of a person who had recently been in a country where a communicable disease was present. The extent of authority for contagion-related expulsions is set out by law in 42 U.S.C. § 265.
The inevitable discovery doctrine was first adopted by the United States Supreme Court in Nix v. Williams in 1984. [2] [3] In that case, Williams, the defendant, challenged the admissibility of evidence about the location and condition of the victim's body, given that it had been obtained from him in violation of his Sixth Amendment right to counsel.