Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26 is a UK constitutional law case in which an anonymised privacy injunction [n 1] was obtained by a claimant, identified in court documents as "PJS", to prohibit publication of the details of a sexual encounter between him and two other people. [1]
PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26 21 April 19 May McBride v Scottish Police Authority [2016] UKSC 27 3 March 15 June McDonald v McDonald [2016] UKSC 28 15-16 March 15 June BNY Mellon Corporate Trustee Services Ltd v LBG Capital No. 1 Plc [2016] UKSC 29 21 March 16 June Brown and another, the Joint Administrators of Loanwell Ltd. v ...
[2014] UKSC 63 23-24 & 26 June 12 November HRH Prince Abdulaziz Bin Mishal Bin Abdulaziz v Apex Global Management Ltd [2014] UKSC 64 13 October 26 November Loveridge v Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Lambeth [2014] UKSC 65 21 October 3 December R (Haney, Kaiyam & Massey) v Secretary of State for Justice [j] [2014] UKSC 66 19-21 May
Jersey Choice Ltd v His Majesty’s Treasury [2024] UKSC 5: 14 February 2024 Value-added tax: A company in the Channel Islands has no claim to loss and damage as a result of removing low value consignment relief from mail order imports into the UK from the Channel Islands. [4] Armstead v Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Company Ltd [2024] UKSC 6
The Competition Appeal Tribunal had erred in law in refusing to make a Collective Proceedings Order in collective proceedings brought by a representative of a group of consumers against companies in the Mastercard group [citation needed] R (on the application of Friends of the Earth Ltd and others) v Heathrow Airport Ltd [2020] UKSC 52: 16 ...
1-4 February 2016; 26 October 2016 17 January Belhaj v Straw [2017] UKSC 3 9-12 November 2015 17 January FirstGroup Plc v Paulley [16] [2017] UKSC 4 15 June 2016 18 January R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5 5-8 December 2016 24 January Akers v Samba Financial Group [17] [2017] UKSC 6 27–28 April 2016
[2019] UKSC 21: 15 May Human rights, Article 14 of the ECHR, Housing Benefit, Welfare Reform Act 2012: The revised lower benefit cap in respect of eligibility for Housing Benefit did not discriminate against lone parents, or lone parents with children under school age, and was therefore considered to be lawful. [21]
Starbucks (HK) Ltd v British Sky Broadcasting Group plc [2015] UKSC 31 25, 26 March 13 May Rhodes v OPO [2015] UKSC 32 19, 20 January 20 May Zurich Insurance PLC UK Branch v International Energy Group Ltd [1] [2015] UKSC 33 15-16 July 2014; 27–28 July 20 May Haile v London Borough of Waltham Forest [2015] UKSC 34 29 January 20 May AR v RN