enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Comparison of free and open-source software licenses

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_free_and...

    FOSS stands for "Free and Open Source Software". There is no one universally agreed-upon definition of FOSS software and various groups maintain approved lists of licenses. . The Open Source Initiative (OSI) is one such organization keeping a list of open-source licenses.

  3. Software license - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_license

    Permissive licenses can be used within copyleft works, but copyleft material cannot be released under a permissive license. Some weak copyleft licenses can be used under the GPL and are said to be GPL-compatible. GPL software can only be used under the GPL or AGPL. [62]

  4. Permissive software license - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permissive_software_license

    A permissive software license, sometimes also called BSD-like or BSD-style license, [1] is a free-software license which instead of copyleft protections, carries only minimal restrictions on how the software can be used, modified, and redistributed, usually including a warranty disclaimer.

  5. Public-domain software - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public-domain_software

    Copyleft free software, therefore, shares many properties with public-domain software, but does not allow relicensing or sublicensing. Unlike real public-domain software or permissive-licensed software, Stallman's copyleft license tries to enforce the free shareability of software also for the future by not allowing license changes.

  6. Copyleft - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyleft

    The strength of the copyleft license governing a work is determined by the extent to which its provisions can be imposed on all kinds of derivative works. Thus, the term "weak copyleft" refers to licenses where not all derivative works inherit the copyleft license; whether a derivative work inherits or not often depends on how it was derived.

  7. Free-software license - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free-software_license

    The Free Software Foundation prefers copyleft (share-alike) free-software licensing rather than permissive free-software licensing for most purposes. Its list distinguishes between free-software licenses that are compatible or incompatible with the FSF's copyleft GNU General Public License .

  8. GNU General Public License - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_General_Public_License

    The licenses in the GPL series are all copyleft licenses, which means that any derivative work must be distributed under the same or equivalent license terms. It is more restrictive than the Lesser General Public License, and even further distinct from the more widely used permissive software licenses such as BSD, MIT, and Apache.

  9. MIT License - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_license

    The Apache License version 2.0 [3] is a similarly permissive license that includes an explicit contributor's patent license. Of specific relevance to US jurisdictions, the MIT license uses the terms "sell" and "use" that are also used in defining the rights of a patent holder in Title 35 of the United States Code section 154.