Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal is headquartered in West Palm Beach, Florida. Its twelve judges have jurisdiction over cases arising in Palm Beach County , Broward County , St. Lucie County , Martin County , Indian River County , and Okeechobee County .
Fairless, M. J. (1990). "Martin v. Wilks: Playing by the Rules in Employment Discrimination Litigation". Missouri Law Review. 55: 703. ISSN 0026-6604. Issacharoff, Samuel (1991). "When Substance Mandates Procedure: Martin v. Wilks and the Rights of Vested Incumbents in Civil Rights Consent Decrees". Cornell Law Review. 77: 189. ISSN 0010-8847.
On January 31, 2022, it was announced by the Manhattan federal district court that Glenn would serve as the chief bankruptcy judge. [5] He assumed his position as chief judge on March 1, 2022. [4] Glenn succeeded Cecelia G. Morris. [6] Glenn is an adjunct professor of law at Columbia Law School. [7] He is a life member of the American Law ...
Martin County Courthouse (North Carolina), Williamston, North Carolina Topics referred to by the same term This disambiguation page lists articles associated with the title Martin County Courthouse .
Martin County is a county located in the southeastern part of the state of Florida, in the United States. As of the 2020 census , the population was 158,431. [ 2 ] Its county seat is Stuart . [ 3 ]
On June 19, 2009, President Barack Obama nominated Martin to a seat on the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit vacated by Judge R. Lanier Anderson III, who assumed senior status on January 31, 2009. [3] The United States Senate confirmed Martin's nomination by a 97–0 vote on January 20, 2010. [4]
Anderson v. Martin, 375 U.S. 399, was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held unconstitutional a Louisiana statute that required that the race of all candidates be listed on ballots. [1] [2]
Phillips v. Martin Marietta Corp., 400 U.S. 542 (1971), was a United States Supreme Court landmark case in which the Court held that under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, an employer may not, in the absence of business necessity, refuse to hire women with pre-school-age children while hiring men with such children.