enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Baker v. Carr - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baker_v._Carr

    Baker v. Carr , 369 U.S. 186 (1962), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that redistricting qualifies as a justiciable question under the Fourteenth Amendment 's equal protection clause, thus enabling federal courts to hear Fourteenth Amendment-based redistricting cases.

  3. One man, one vote - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_man,_one_vote

    However, in Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962) the United States Supreme Court under Chief Justice Earl Warren overturned the previous decision in Colegrove holding that malapportionment claims under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment were not exempt from judicial review under Article IV, Section 4, as the equal protection ...

  4. List of United States Supreme Court cases involving standing

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Massachusetts v. EPA: 2007: States have standing to sue the EPA to enforce their views of federal law, in this case, the view that carbon dioxide was an air pollutant under the Clean Air Act. Cited Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Co. as precedent. 5–4 Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation: 2007: Bond v. United States: 2011

  5. Felix Frankfurter - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felix_Frankfurter

    In Baker v. Carr, Frankfurter's position was that the federal courts did not have the right to tell sovereign state governments how to apportion their legislatures; he thought the Supreme Court should not get involved in political questions, whether federal or local. [61] Frankfurter's view had won out in the 1946 case preceding Baker, Colegrove v.

  6. Equal Protection Clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Protection_Clause

    The first modern application of the Equal Protection Clause to voting law came in Baker v. Carr (1962), where the Court ruled that the districts that sent representatives to the Tennessee state legislature were so malapportioned (with some legislators representing ten times the number of residents as others) that they violated the Equal ...

  7. Justiciability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justiciability

    In Baker v. Carr , the Supreme Court of the United States identified six factors which it considered indicative of cases involving political questions: "a textually demonstrable constitutional commitment of the issue to a coordinate political department" (meaning that the U.S. Constitution requires another branch of government to resolve ...

  8. AOL Mail for Verizon Customers - AOL Help

    help.aol.com/products/aol-mail-verizon

    AOL Mail welcomes Verizon customers to our safe and delightful email experience!

  9. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Warren Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States: 348 U.S. 272 (1955) Federal government did not owe Indian tribe compensation for timber taken from tribal-occupied lands in Alaska under the 5th Amendment: Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co. 348 U.S. 426 (1955) definition of taxable income: Williamson v. Lee: 348 U.S. 483 (1955) Due Process Clause, economic ...