Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Under Title 18 Section 871 of the United States Code it is illegal to knowingly and willfully make "any threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon the president of the United States." This also applies to any "President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office of President ...
Free speech in the United States. Union, NJ: Lawbook Exchange. ISBN 1-58477-085-6. Cronin, Mary M. (ed.) An Indispensable Liberty: The Fight for Free Speech in Nineteenth-Century America. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 2016. Donohue, Laura K (2005). "Terrorist Speech and the Future of Free Expression" (PDF). Cardozo Law Review.
Arcara v. Cloud Books, Inc., 478 U.S. 697 (1986), was a United States Supreme Court case about the First Amendment and whether freedom of speech was violated by shutting down a bookstore because of illicit sexual activities occurring there. The court held that the closure was aimed at nonexpressive activity and its incidental burden on speech ...
Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights, Inc., 547 U.S. 47 (2006), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the federal government, under the Solomon Amendment, could constitutionally withhold funding from universities if they refuse to give military recruiters access to school resources.
This category includes court cases that deal with the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, providing that "Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
The Education Secretary was defending the proposed Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Bill during the Queen’s Speech debate. No protection for Holocaust deniers under new free speech laws ...
The so-called “medical free speech protection” was a last-minute add to House Bill 315, a more than 400-page bill pa (The Center Square) – Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine let stand higher fees for ...
In the school context, the United States Supreme Court has identified three major relevant considerations: [9] The extent to which the student's speech-in-question poses a substantial threat of disruption (Tinker v. Des Moines Indep. Cmty. Sch. Dist.). Whether the speech is sexually vulgar or obscene (Bethel School District v.