Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
= 5.919 388 020 8 3 × 10 −6 m 3: teaspoon (metric) ≡ 5.0 × 10 −6 m 3: ≡ 5.0 × 10 −6 m 3: teaspoon (US customary) tsp ≡ 1 ⁄ 6 US fl oz = 4.928 921 593 75 × 10 −6 m 3: teaspoon (US food nutrition labeling) tsp ≡ 5 mL [18] = 5 × 10 −6 m 3: timber foot: ≡ 1 cu ft = 0.028 316 846 592 m 3: ton (displacement) ≡ 35 cu ft ...
For example, if a car lot had 12 vehicles, of which 2 are white, 6 are red, and; 4 are yellow, then the ratio of red to white to yellow cars is 6 to 2 to 4. The ratio of yellow cars to white cars is 4 to 2 and may be expressed as 4:2 or 2:1. A ratio is often converted to a fraction when it is expressed as a ratio to the whole.
However, if the fraction 1/1 is replaced by the fraction 2/2, which is an equivalent fraction denoting the same rational number 1, the mediant of the fractions 2/2 and 1/2 is 3/4. For a stronger connection to rational numbers the fractions may be required to be reduced to lowest terms, thereby selecting unique representatives from the ...
The simplified equation is not entirely equivalent to the original. For when we substitute y = 0 and z = 0 in the last equation, both sides simplify to 0, so we get 0 = 0, a mathematical truth. But the same substitution applied to the original equation results in x/6 + 0/0 = 1, which is mathematically meaningless.
1 ⁄ 3: 0.333... Vulgar Fraction One Third 2153 8531 ⅔ 2 ⁄ 3: 0.666... Vulgar Fraction Two Thirds 2154 8532 ⅕ 1 ⁄ 5: 0.2 Vulgar Fraction One Fifth 2155 8533 ⅖ 2 ⁄ 5: 0.4 Vulgar Fraction Two Fifths 2156 8534 ⅗ 3 ⁄ 5: 0.6 Vulgar Fraction Three Fifths 2157 8535 ⅘ 4 ⁄ 5: 0.8 Vulgar Fraction Four Fifths 2158 8536 ⅙ 1 ⁄ 6: 0 ...
Two fractions a / b and c / d are equal or equivalent if and only if ad = bc.) For example, 1 / 4 , 5 / 6 , and −101 / 100 are all irreducible fractions. On the other hand, 2 / 4 is reducible since it is equal in value to 1 / 2 , and the numerator of 1 / 2 is less than the numerator ...
For the folded general continued fractions of both expressions, the rate convergence μ = (3 − √ 8) 2 = 17 − √ 288 ≈ 0.02943725, hence 1 / μ = (3 + √ 8) 2 = 17 + √ 288 ≈ 33.97056, whose common logarithm is 1.531... ≈ 26 / 17 > 3 / 2 , thus adding at least three digits per two terms. This is because the ...
The coefficients beyond the last in any of these representations should be interpreted as +∞; and the best rational will be one of z(x 1, y 1), z(x 1, y 2), z(x 2, y 1), or z(x 2, y 2). For example, the decimal representation 3.1416 could be rounded from any number in the interval [3.14155, 3.14165) .