Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Smith v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 (1979), was a Supreme Court case holding that the installation and use of a pen register by the police to obtain information on a suspect's telephone calls was not a "search" within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and hence no search warrant was required.
A new Maryland Law, "So Everybody Can Move Act," requires the Maryland Medical Assistance Program and state commercial plans to cover prosthetics designed for physical activities, including ...
Maryland Law was founded in 1816 as the Maryland Law Institute. [4] David Hoffman is credited with founding the institute, and in 1817 he published his legal course Hoffman's Course of Legal Study. The school began regular instruction in 1824, [5] and it is the fourth oldest law school in the United States. [6]
Melony G. Griffith, Larry Hogan and Adrienne A. Jones enacting Maryland law in April 2022. The Laws of Maryland comprise the session laws have been enacted by the Maryland General Assembly each year. According to the Boston College Law library, session laws are "useful in determining which laws were in force at a particular time." Unlike the ...
Maryland said that the law's fingerprinting and safety course requirements "have significant public safety benefits." The Richmond, Virginia-based 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor ...
Under the Maryland law, an applicant for a handgun license must meet four requirements. They must be at least 21 years old, a resident of the state, complete a gun safety course and undergo a ...
The current Constitution of the State of Maryland, which was ratified by the people of the state on September 18, 1867, forms the basic law for the U.S. state of Maryland. It replaced the short-lived Maryland Constitution of 1864 and is the fourth constitution under which the state has been governed. It was last amended in 2024.
Brought "Westminster" law to Maryland's Assembly (charges which Peter Hoffer and N. E. H. Hull write was "an example of colonial dislike for trained English Law") [2] Demanded exorbitant fees as a lawyer (implicit that he leveraged his judicial office to obtain them) [2] Simultaneously defended opposing parties in a lawsuit [2]