enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. Give Your Wedding Guests a Sweet Ending With These M&M ... - AOL

   www.aol.com/entertainment/wedding-guests-sweet...

   Sponsored content. Us Weekly receives compensation for this article as well as for purchases made when you click on a link and buy something below. If you’re planning a wedding, you surely ...

3. Presidential M&M's - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_M&M's

   Packs of presidential M&M's during the Obama administration. Presidential M&M's is the name given to the commemorative packs of red, white, and blue-colored M&M's given to guests of the president of the United States on board Air Force One and in other presidential locations.

4. M-Azing - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M-Azing

   M&M'S Chocolate Bar (formerly known as M-Azing) is a candy bar manufactured by Mars, Incorporated. It is a milk chocolate candy bar with M&M's Minis inside.

5. Treets - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treets

   Treets were a brand of confectionery sold by Mars Limited in the UK, Italy, France, Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands.. The original product consisted of peanuts coated in milk chocolate with an outer shell of dark brown glazed candy, and appeared in the UK in the 1960s; these were later marketed as Peanut Treets (sold in a yellow packet), together with Toffee Treets (sold in a blue packet ...

6. Jelly Belly - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jelly_Belly

   However, he "started to favor M&M's as the official White House candy during his eighth and final year in office." [23] In 2001, the company renamed itself to Jelly Belly Candy Company. [13] In 2022, the company countersued Klein in federal court for falsely claiming to be the founder of the company. [24]

7. Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masterpiece_Cakeshop_v...

   Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, 584 U.S. 617 (2018), was a case in the Supreme Court of the United States that addressed whether owners of public accommodations can refuse certain services based on the First Amendment claims of free speech and free exercise of religion, and therefore be granted an exemption from laws ensuring non-discrimination in public ...