Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Labour Court is a South African court that handles labour law cases, that is, disputes arising from the relationship between employer, employee and trade union.The court was established by the Labour Relations Act, 1995, and has a status similar to that of a division of the High Court.
Pages in category "Labour Court of South Africa cases" The following 6 pages are in this category, out of 6 total. This list may not reflect recent changes. D.
Kylie v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration and Others is an important decision in South African labour law, handed down on 26 May 2010 in the Labour Appeal Court of South Africa.
Independent Municipal & Allied Trade Union v Rustenburg Transitional Council is a significant case in South African labour law.The council, the employer in this case, had adopted a resolution prohibiting employees in senior managerial positions from holding executive positions in trade unions or engaging in trade-union activities.
Mankayi v AngloGold Ashanti Ltd is a 2011 decision of the Constitutional Court of South Africa in South African labour law and the South African law of delict.The court upheld the right of mineworkers to sue at common law for damages incurred due to occupational disease and occupational injury.
In South African National Defence Union v Minister of Defence and Others, an important case in South African labour law, the Constitutional Court gave judgment on a series of disputes connected to collective bargaining that had arisen between the South African National Defence Union (SANDU) and the South African National Defence Force (SANDF).
South African National Defence Union v Minister of Defence & Another, an important case in South African labour law, concerned the question of whether or not it was constitutional to prohibit members of the armed forces from participating in public protest action, and from joining trade unions.
The South African Post Office (SAPO) sought a declaratory order that the termination of a certain Mr K. Mampeule's employment, as a direct result of his removal on May 21, 2007, from SAPO's board of directors, did not constitute a dismissal for purposes of section 186(1)(a) of the Labour Relations Act [1] (LRA). This proposition was founded on ...