enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Monell v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monell_v._Department_of...

    Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 (1978), is an opinion given by the United States Supreme Court in which the Court overruled Monroe v. Pape by holding that a local government is a "person" subject to suit under Section 1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code: Civil action for deprivation of rights. [1]

  3. Thompson v. Clark - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thompson_v._Clark

    Thompson v. Clark, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning whether a plaintiff suing for malicious prosecution must show that they were affirmatively exonerated of committing the alleged crime.

  4. Qualified immunity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualified_immunity

    Qualified immunity frequently arises in civil rights cases, [8] particularly in lawsuits arising under 42 USC § 1983 and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents (1971). [9] Under 42 USC § 1983, a plaintiff can sue for damages when state officials violate their constitutional rights or other federal rights. The text of 42 USC § 1983 reads as ...

  5. Monroe v. Pape - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monroe_v._Pape

    The case was significant because it held that 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a statutory provision from 1871, could be used to sue state officers who violated a plaintiff's constitutional rights. [3] § 1983 had previously been a relatively obscure and little-used statute, but since Monroe it has become a central part of United States civil rights law.

  6. Pierson v. Ray - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierson_v._Ray

    Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 (1967), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court first introduced the justification for qualified immunity for police officers from being sued for civil rights violations under Section 1983, by arguing that "[a] policeman's lot is not so unhappy that he must choose between being charged with dereliction of duty if he does not arrest when he had ...

  7. Ku Klux Klan Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku_Klux_Klan_Act

    Section 1 (42 USC § 1983) [ edit ] Section 1 of the Act, which has since been amended and codified as section 1979 of the Revised Statutes ( 42 U.S.C. § 1983) and is also known simply as "Section 1983", authorized monetary and injunctive relief against anyone who, acting under the authority of state law, deprived a person of rights guaranteed ...

  8. Town of Castle Rock v. Gonzales - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Town_of_Castle_Rock_v...

    Castle Rock v. Gonzales, 545 U.S. 748 (2005), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled, 7–2, that a town and its police department could not be sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for refusing to enforce a restraining order, even though the refusal led to the murders of a woman's three children by her estranged husband.

  9. Estelle v. Gamble - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estelle_v._Gamble

    Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 (1976), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States established the standard of what a prisoner must plead in order to claim a violation of Eighth Amendment rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Specifically, the Court held that a prisoner must allege acts or omissions sufficiently harmful to evidence ...