Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Template documentation Shows a link (a small icon of a cog) to The Reasonator (by Magnus Manske ) , a tool page that renders the wikidata about an item into easily readable text. Note: This template does not appear in mainspace, per the rules about linking to Wikidata from articles .
A history essay sometimes referred to as a thesis essay describes an argument or claim about one or more historical events and supports that claim with evidence, arguments, and references. The text makes it clear to the reader why the argument or claim is as such.
This template is a more strongly worded version of {}, which indicates a potential dispute, most often a question about reliable sourcing for the statement/fact at issue; {{Disputed inline}} indicates that at least one editor believes there is no question that the statement has a verifiability problem.
In contract law, the term "boilerplate language" or "boilerplate clause" describes the parts of a contract that are considered standard.A standard form contract or boilerplate contract is a contract between two parties, where the terms and conditions of the contract are set by one of the parties, and the other party has little or no ability to negotiate more favorable terms and is thus placed ...
The {{Citation needed}} template aims to promote accountable discourse. To ensure that all Wikipedia content is verifiable , Wikipedia provides a means for anyone to question an uncited claim . If your work has been tagged, please provide a reliable source for the statement, and discuss if needed.
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
Critical thinking is the process of analyzing available facts, evidence, observations, and arguments to make sound conclusions or informed choices. It involves recognizing underlying assumptions, providing justifications for ideas and actions, evaluating these justifications through comparisons with varying perspectives, and assessing their rationality and potential consequences. [1]
The contentions, of which a case must have at least one, links the resolution to the value. A proper contention necessarily has a claim, which summarizes the argument, at least one warrant, which is a reason the claim is true, and an impact, which explains the importance of the argument—or specifically why the argument meets the value criterium.