enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Hearsay in United States law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hearsay_in_United_States_law

    Hearsay is testimony from a witness under oath who is reciting an out-of-court statement that is being offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. The Federal Rules of Evidence prohibit introducing hearsay statements during applicable federal court proceedings, unless one of nearly thirty exemptions or exceptions applies. [1]

  3. Ohio v. Clark - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohio_v._Clark

    Ohio v. Clark , 576 U.S. 237 (2015), is United States Supreme Court case opinion that narrowed the standard set in Crawford v. Washington for determining whether hearsay statements in criminal cases are permitted under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment .

  4. Hearsay - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hearsay

    Hearsay evidence is covered by sections 16-22 of the Evidence Act 2006. Previously inadmissible, the 1989 decision of the Court of Appeal in R v Baker created a common law exception to the hearsay rule based on reliability, which was codified in the Evidence Act. Pursuant to s 4(1) of the act, a hearsay statement is a statement made by someone ...

  5. Party admission - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_admission

    The "statements against interest" rule is different because: It is party neutral (the hearsay exemption is party-specific). The declarant must be unavailable. The statement must be against the penal interest (under federal rules of evidence) or the fiscal or social interest (under the rules of states not following the federal rules).

  6. Prior consistent statements and prior inconsistent statements

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prior_consistent...

    However, under Federal Rule of Evidence 801 and the minority of U.S. jurisdictions that have adopted this rule, a prior inconsistent statement may be introduced as evidence of the truth of the statement itself if the prior statement was given in live testimony and under oath as part of a formal hearing, proceeding, trial, or deposition. [2]

  7. Local prosecutor's office argues case at Ohio Supreme Court ...

    www.aol.com/local-prosecutors-office-argues-case...

    ZANESVILLE − The Muskingum County Prosecutor’s Office is awaiting a decision from the Ohio Supreme Court regarding evidence in a local custody case.. The local prosecutor's office argued on ...

  8. Federal Rules of Evidence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Rules_of_Evidence

    Rule 804. Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay–when the Declarant is Unavailable as a Witness; Rule 805. Hearsay Within Hearsay; Rule 806. Attacking and Supporting the Declarant's Credibility; Rule 807. Residual Exceptions; Authentication and Identification Rule 901. Authenticating or Identifying Evidence; Rule 902. Evidence that is Self ...

  9. Did Ohio Republicans violate legal rules commenting on Trump ...

    www.aol.com/did-ohio-republicans-violate-legal...

    This is a weekly column for The Cincinnati Enquirer