Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In the Eighth Circuit, the court rejected Bucklew's facial challenge, as well as turned down his as-applied challenge as given but allowed Bucklew's case to be reheard if he could demonstrate that there was a feasible alternative, as per Baze. [9] Prior to the rehearing, the Supreme Court concluded in Glossip v.
The Competency Screening Test was developed by researchers at the Harvard Laboratory of Community Psychiatry in 1971. The test uses 22 fill in the blank style questions such as "If the jury finds me guilty, I will _____." Each answer is given a score of 0 (incompetent), 1 (uncertain competence), or 2 (competent).
Circuit Judge Lavenski Smith: Little Rock, AR: 1958 2002–present 2017–2024 — G.W. Bush: 56 Circuit Judge Raymond Gruender: Saint Louis, MO: 1963 2004–present — — G.W. Bush: 57 Circuit Judge Duane Benton: Kansas City, MO: 1950 2004–present — — G.W. Bush: 58 Circuit Judge Bobby Shepherd: El Dorado, AR: 1951 2006–present ...
Sell v. United States, 539 U.S. 166 (2003), is a decision in which the United States Supreme Court imposed stringent limits on the right of a lower court to order the forcible administration of antipsychotic medication to a criminal defendant who had been determined to be incompetent to stand trial for the sole purpose of making them competent and able to be tried.
First, it points to a difficult issue in competency evaluations. Although the standards for competency were set forth in Dusky v. United States, [5] much of the standard remains ambiguous and is not clearly defined. Only one common principle is clear in forensic evaluations, that forensic evaluators cannot reach a finding independent of the ...
Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the common law rule that the insane cannot be executed; therefore the petitioner is entitled to a competency evaluation and to an evidentiary hearing in court on the question of their competency to be executed.
The Eighth Circuit ruled in Dansby v. Norris that "Martinez" does not apply in states that allow ineffective assistance claims on direct appeal. The Fifth Circuit ruled in Gates v. Thaler that Martinez did not apply in Texas but the Supreme Court reversed in Trevino v. Thaler. [5]
Fellers, 285 F.3d 721 (8th Cir. 2002); cert. granted, 538 U.S. 905 (2003). Holding The Eighth Circuit erred in holding that the absence of an "interrogation" foreclosed petitioner's claim that his jailhouse statements should have been suppressed as fruits of the statements taken from him at his home.