enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Jensen box - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jensen_box

    Simple reaction time correlates with general cognitive ability, [4] and there is some evidence that the slope of responding on the Jensen box does as well. [2] Ian Deary and colleagues, in a population-based cohort study of 900 individuals, demonstrated correlations between IQ and simple choice RTs between –0.3 and –0.5. [ 4 ]

  3. Eriksen flanker task - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eriksen_flanker_task

    These examples all use an arbitrary mapping between the stimulus and the response. Another possibility is to use a natural mapping, with arrows as stimuli. For example, Kopp et al. (1994) [6] used left and right arrows, with flanker stimuli above and below the target. The flankers could be arrows pointing in the same direction as the target ...

  4. Mental chronometry - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mental_chronometry

    Nevertheless, the study of conscious accompaniments in the context of reaction time was an important historical development in the late 1800s and early 1900s. For example, Wundt and his associate Oswald Külpe often studied reaction time by asking participants to describe the conscious process that occurred during performance on such tasks. [8]

  5. Dopamine released during exercise linked to improved reaction ...

    www.aol.com/dopamine-released-during-exercise...

    Pleasure hormone dopamine is a key cause of improved reaction times following exercise, according to new research. Scientists at the University of Portsmouth say the findings could lead to new ...

  6. Continuous performance task - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_performance_task

    Reaction times: This measures the amount of time between the presentation of the stimulus and the client's response. Omission errors: This indicates the number of times the target was presented, but the client did not respond/click the mouse. High omission rates indicate that the subject is either not paying attention (distractibility) to ...

  7. Stimulus–response compatibility - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stimulus–response...

    Also important to S–R compatibility is the type of stimulus; familiar objects tend to invite specific responses. As one example, if an object is perceived as more easily (or more typically) manipulable with one hand than the other, any response requiring use of the other hand will tend to have a long reaction time. [8]

  8. Taylor Aggression Paradigm - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_Aggression_Paradigm

    The Taylor Aggression Paradigm (TAP; also commonly referred to as the Competitive Reaction Time Task [1]) is a prominent, well-validated, laboratory analog measure of aggressive behavior in humans, predominantly utilized within the field of psychology.

  9. Simon effect - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_effect

    Simon wished to see if an alteration of the spatial relationship, relative to the response keys, affected performance. Age was also a probable factor in reaction time. As predicted, the reaction time of the groups increased based on the relative position of the light stimulus (age was not a factor). The reaction time increased by as much as 30% ...