Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The work was praised by Mark Golden for showing how a Marxist analysis can help explain the historical process. [5] The work was criticised by Yvon Garlan for involving a fundamentalist reading of Marx, though Paul Cartledge disagreed with this analysis, praising Ste. Croix for his avoiding dogmatically following Marx. [6]
He explains Marx's theory of classes as an institutional or objective social situation that influences human minds and makes them act accordingly. Popper notes the dangers of oversimplifying political conflicts as struggles between exploiters and exploited, and warns of the dangers inherent in Marx's sweeping historicist generalization.
The Marxist theory of history, in spite of the serious efforts of some of its founders and followers, ultimately adopted this soothsaying practice. In some of its earlier formulations (for example in Marx's analysis of the character of the 'coming social revolution') their predictions were testable, and in fact falsified.
Narrative of the work develops around analysis of the relations between "civil society" and "political society". For Marx, the modern state, originating in Europe , is characterized by an historically unprecedented separation between an individual's "real" life in civil society from his "political" life as a citizen of the state. [ 4 ]
The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to Marxism: . Marxism – method of socioeconomic analysis that analyzes class relations and societal conflict using a materialist interpretation of historical development and a dialectical view of social transformation.
According to Michael Denning by identifying the lumpenproletariat, "Marx was combating the established view that the entire working class was a dangerous and immoral element. He drew a line between the proletariat and the lumpenproletariat to defend the moral character of the former."
Rubin refers to this part of the social as the "sex/gender system." In making this analysis, she combines elements of various theoretical frameworks. She first attacks Marxism, arguing that it is unable to "fully express or conceptualize sex oppression." [12] Marx offers a very useful account of women's role only in the industrial capitalist ...
Empire has been described by the London Review of Books as "the most successful work of political theory to come from the Left for a generation." [6] The book has been highly influential on numerous debates within the left, and has even been called "a bible of the anti-globalisation movement" by one critic and "the most influential book in recent decades on a classic sociological theme".