enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. United States v. Miller (1976) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Miller_(1976)

    United States v. Miller, 425 U.S. 435 (1976), was a United States Supreme Court that held that bank records are not subject to protection under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [1] The case, along with Smith v. Maryland, established the principle of the third-party doctrine in relation to privacy rights.

  3. List of landmark court decisions in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    United States v. Lara, 541 U.S. 193 (2004) As an Indian tribe and the United States are separate sovereigns, both the United States and a Native American (Indian) tribe can prosecute an Indian for the same acts that constituted crimes in both jurisdictions without invoking double jeopardy if the actions of the accused violated Federal law ...

  4. Steagald v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steagald_v._United_States

    Steagald v. United States, 451 U.S. 204 (1981), is a United States Supreme Court case which held that, based on the Fourth Amendment, a police officer may not conduct a warrantless search of a third party's home in an attempt to apprehend the subject of an arrest warrant, absent consent or exigent circumstances.

  5. A brief history of third parties in the US - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/brief-history-third-parties...

    Though none of America's third parties have won a presidential election, they have nonetheless had a large impact on the country's politics A brief history of third parties in the US Skip to main ...

  6. Holmes v. South Carolina - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holmes_v._South_Carolina

    Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 (2006), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court involving the right of a criminal defendant to present evidence that a third party instead committed the crime.

  7. Illinois v. Rodriguez - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_v._Rodriguez

    Case history; Prior: Cert. to Appellate Court of Illinois, 1st Dist. reversed and remanded: Holding; Under the Fourth Amendment, a warrantless entry is valid when based upon the consent of a third party whom the police, at the time of the entry, reasonably believe to possess common authority over the premises, but who in fact does not.

  8. Third Party System - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Party_System

    The Third Party System was a period in the history of political parties in the United States from the 1850s until the 1890s, which featured profound developments in issues of American nationalism, modernization, and race.

  9. Category:United States Third-Party Doctrine - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:United_States...

    This category is for court cases in the United States dealing with the Fourth Amendment's Third-Party Doctrine. Pages in category "United States Third-Party Doctrine" The following 4 pages are in this category, out of 4 total.