Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
An article about an essay that uses Hangman to explain the subject. We already have the essay, don't need the article too. An article that is just a resume so you can possibly get hired by people who googled your name. It’s not quirky, it’s just unsourced advertising.
(See: Conflict of interest, Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause, and An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing.) A topic on which no published, reliable, third-party sources exist – see Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything and Wikipedia:Verifiability .
Argue against the idea, not the person. Remember, you've had plenty of bad ideas yourself. Give reasons. Explain why the idea is bad. Refer to policies, guidelines, essays, other discussions, etc., but give context – don't just throw acronyms out there (especially WP:MIAB). Suggest changes. Many bad ideas aren't 100% bad. Maybe the idea ...
Welles distinguishes stupidity from ignorance, where stupidity means one must know they are acting in their own worst interest in that it must be a choice, not a forced act or accident. Lastly, it requires the activity to be maladaptive, in that it is in the worst interest of the actor, and specifically done to prevent adaptation to new data or ...
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Special pages; Help; Learn to edit; Community portal; Recent changes; Upload file
Religious fanaticism or religious extremism is a pejorative designation used to indicate uncritical zeal or obsessive enthusiasm that is related to one's own, or one's group's, devotion to a religion – a form of human fanaticism that could otherwise be expressed in one's other involvements and participation, including employment, role, and partisan affinities.
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
To write that someone insisted, speculated, or surmised can suggest the degree of the person's carefulness, resoluteness, or access to evidence, even when such things are unverifiable. To say that someone asserted or claimed something can call their statement's credibility into question, by emphasizing any potential contradiction or implying ...