enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Stanley v. City of Sanford - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_v._City_of_Sanford

    Stanley v. City of Sanford is a pending United States Supreme Court case in which the Court will determine whether or not a former employee who was qualified to perform her job and who earned post-employment benefits while employed lose her right to sue over discrimination with respect to those benefits solely because she no longer holds her job, under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.

  3. Jury awards former Wells Fargo supervisor $22 million in ADA ...

    www.aol.com/jury-awards-former-wells-fargo...

    A Wells Fargo supervisor who had been fired by the banking giant won a disability discrimination lawsuit against it and was awarded $22.1 million by a federal court jury in Charlotte.

  4. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americans_with...

    The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 or ADA (42 U.S.C. § 12101) is a civil rights law that prohibits discrimination based on disability. It affords similar protections against discrimination to Americans with disabilities as the Civil Rights Act of 1964 , [ 1 ] which made discrimination based on race , religion , sex , national origin ...

  5. Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_Motor_Manufacturing...

    Williams claimed to be disabled and unable to perform her job at Toyota because of carpal tunnel syndrome and related problems. She successfully sued Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. for failure to provide "reasonable accommodations" as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §12112(b)(5)(A). [2]

  6. Jury awards former Wells Fargo supervisor $22 million in ADA ...

    www.aol.com/news/jury-awards-former-wells-fargo...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  7. Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Board_of_Trustees_of_the...

    Even in cases of racial discrimination in which the courts apply a different standard of scrutiny to government action from rational basis review, evidence of disparate impact is insufficient: "The ADA also forbids 'utilizing standards, criteria, or methods of administration' that disparately impact the disabled, without regard to whether such ...

  8. US Supreme Court throws out decision reviving disability bias ...

    www.aol.com/news/us-supreme-court-throws...

    Laufer accused the company of violating a federal rule under the Americans with Disabilities Act, a landmark 1990 civil rights law, requiring reservation systems to include accessibility information.

  9. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 [2] Architectural Barriers Act of 1968; Bostock v. Clayton County –— a landmark United States Supreme Court case in 2020 in which the Court held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects employees against discrimination because of their sexual orientation or gender identity