enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Incorporation of the Bill of Rights - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incorporation_of_the_Bill...

    t. e. In United States constitutional law, incorporation is the doctrine by which portions of the Bill of Rights have been made applicable to the states. When the Bill of Rights was ratified, the courts held that its protections extended only to the actions of the federal government and that the Bill of Rights did not place limitations on the ...

  3. Adamson v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adamson_v._California

    U.S. Const. amends. V, XIV. Overruled by. Malloy v. Hogan (1964) Adamson v. California, 332 U.S. 46 (1947), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the incorporation of the Fifth Amendment of the Bill of Rights. Its decision is part of a long line of cases that eventually led to the Selective Incorporation Doctrine.

  4. Palko v. Connecticut - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palko_v._Connecticut

    Overruled by. Benton v. Maryland, 395 U.S. 784 (1969) Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U.S. 319 (1937), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning the incorporation of the Fifth Amendment protection against double jeopardy. [1] Justice Benjamin Cardozo, writing for the majority, explained that some Constitutional protections that would apply ...

  5. Barron v. Baltimore - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barron_v._Baltimore

    Barron v. Baltimore, 32 U.S. (7 Pet.) 243 (1833), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case in 1833, which helped define the concept of federalism in US constitutional law. The Court ruled that the Bill of Rights did not apply to the state governments, establishing a precedent until the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment to the ...

  6. McDonald v. City of Chicago - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonald_v._City_of_Chicago

    Texas (1894) McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (2010), was a landmark [1] decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that found that the right of an individual to "keep and bear arms", as protected under the Second Amendment, is incorporated by the Fourteenth Amendment and is thereby enforceable against the states.

  7. Twining v. New Jersey - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twining_v._New_Jersey

    Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U.S. 78 (1908), was a case of the U.S. Supreme Court.In this case, the Court established the Incorporation Doctrine by concluding that while certain rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights might apply to the states under the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause, the Fifth Amendment's right against self-incrimination is not incorporated.

  8. United States Bill of Rights - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Bill_of_Rights

    The Bill of Rights had little judicial impact for the first 150 years of its existence; in the words of Gordon S. Wood, "After ratification, most Americans promptly forgot about the first ten amendments to the Constitution." [82] [83] The Court made no important decisions protecting free speech rights, for example, until 1931. [84]

  9. Fundamental rights - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_rights

    Later Supreme Court justices found a way around these limitations without overturning the Slaughterhouse precedent: they created a concept called Selective Incorporation. Under this legal theory, the court used the remaining Fourteenth Amendment protections for equal protection and due process to "incorporate" individual elements of the Bill of ...