enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixth_Amendment_to_the...

    The Sixth Amendment (Amendment VI) to the United States Constitution sets forth rights related to criminal prosecutions. It was ratified in 1791 as part of the United States Bill of Rights. The Supreme Court has applied all but one of this amendment's protections to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

  3. Gideon v. Wainwright - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gideon_v._Wainwright

    Brady (1942) Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution requires U.S. states to provide attorneys to criminal defendants who are unable to afford their own. The case extended the right to counsel, which had been found under the ...

  4. List of amendments to the Constitution of the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_amendments_to_the...

    The first ten amendments were adopted and ratified simultaneously and are known collectively as the Bill of Rights. The 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments are collectively known as the Reconstruction Amendments. Six amendments adopted by Congress and sent to the states have not been ratified by the required number of states.

  5. Confrontation Clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confrontation_Clause

    In 2004, in Crawford v.Washington, the Supreme Court of the United States significantly redefined the application of the Sixth Amendment's right to confrontation. In Crawford, the Supreme Court changed the inquiry from whether the evidence offered had an "indicia of reliability" to whether the evidence is testimonial hearsay. [3]

  6. Massiah v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massiah_v._United_States

    Massiah v. United States, 377 U.S. 201 (1964), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits the government from eliciting statements from the defendant about themselves after the point that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel attaches.

  7. Crawford v. Washington - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crawford_v._Washington

    Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision that reformulated the standard for determining when the admission of hearsay statements in criminal cases is permitted under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment. The Court held that prior testimonial statements of witnesses who have since ...

  8. Speedy Trial Clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speedy_Trial_Clause

    t. e. The Speedy Trial Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides, "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial...". [1] The Clause protects the defendant from delay between the presentation of the indictment or similar charging instrument and the beginning of trial.

  9. Strickland v. Washington - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strickland_v._Washington

    Marshall. Laws applied. U.S. Const. amend. VI. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), was a landmark Supreme Court case that established the standard for determining when a criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel is violated by that counsel's inadequate performance. [1]