Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In the future, North Hollywood plans a $1 billion mixed-use development at Lankershim and Chandler, surrounding the Metro B and G line terminals. The project would re-develop 15.6 acres (63,000 m 2 ) with 600,000 square feet (56,000 m 2 ) of commercial space and nearly 1500 residential units in three high-rise towers.
The Lankershim branch of the Los Angeles Co. Free Library was established November 1914 and located at the "newspaper office." [7] The Lankershim branch was located at 11228 Margate Avenue c. 1921. [8] The Lankershim branch officially joined LAPL in February 1924, [9] and was renamed in 1927 and became the Sidney Lanier branch. [10]
Lankershim, Los Angeles County, California (1896–1927), pre-annexation settlement, place name and rail stop, or neighboring West Lankershim, both predecessors to today’s North Hollywood; North Hollywood, Los Angeles
Lankershim Boulevard was named after Isaac Lankershim, one of the area's founding families, and is one of the oldest streets in what is now North Hollywood. The boulevard was a major thoroughfare for the town of Toluca (which was renamed Lankershim in 1896 and North Hollywood in 1927), connecting it to Los Angeles by way of the Cahuenga Pass.
North Hollywood station is located on two large blocks near the intersection of Lankershim Boulevard and Chandler Boulevard. The B Line platform is located under Lankershim and the original entrance to the station, under three colorful arched canopies called "Kaleidoscope Dreams," [23] is
Just Words. If you love Scrabble, you'll love the wonderful word game fun of Just Words. Play Just Words free online! By Masque Publishing
Lankershim, Los Angeles County, California (1896–1927) an archaic placename for what is now North Hollywood, Los Angeles, or adjacent West Lankershim (?–1927) Lankershim Depot in North Hollywood, built 1896 as Toluca Depot of the Southern Pacific Railroad , used 1911–1952 as dual Southern Pacific- Pacific Electric station
Other studies of nutrition labeling have produced mixed findings and have found, at best, limited effects of labeling on overall diet quality and calorie intake (Siva K. Balasubramanian and Catherine Cole 2002, Tanja V.E. Kral et al. 2002, Jennifer D. Seymour et al. 2004, and Jayachandran N. Variyam 2005).