enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gertz_v._Robert_Welch,_Inc.

    Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323 (1974), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court establishing the standard of First Amendment protection against defamation claims brought by private individuals.

  3. List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 499

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 499 of the United States Reports: ... California v. Hodari D.]] 499 U.S. 621: 1991: Cole v ...

  4. Time, Inc. v. Hill - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time,_Inc._v._Hill

    The United States Supreme Court foresaw and partially prevented this problem in its first false light case, Time, Inc. v. Hill." [4] Regarding the rationale of the decision by the Supreme Court in the case, the authors noted, "The Court's reasoning was parallel to the reasoning being developed in defamation cases: Errors are inevitable in free ...

  5. Actual malice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actual_malice

    This term was adopted by the Supreme Court in its landmark 1964 ruling in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, [2] in which the Warren Court held that: . The constitutional guarantees require, we think, a Federal rule that prohibits a public official from recovering damages for a defamatory falsehood relating to his official conduct unless he proves that the statement was made with 'actual malice ...

  6. Rudy Giuliani’s lawyers want to quit over a ‘disagreement ...

    www.aol.com/news/rudy-giuliani-lawyers-want-quit...

    The Georgia criminal case also charges Trump and a slew of the former president’s associates with a widespread scheme to interfere in the Peach State’s presidential election result four years ago.

  7. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  8. Burnett v. National Enquirer, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burnett_v._National...

    Carol Burnett v. National Enquirer, Inc. was a decision by the California Court of Appeal, which ruled that the "actual malice" required under California law for imposition of punitive damages is distinct from the "actual malice" required by New York Times Co. v. Sullivan to be liable for defaming a "public figure", and that the National Enquirer is not a "newspaper" for the purposes of ...

  9. False light - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_light

    False light privacy claims often arise under the same facts as defamation cases, and therefore not all states recognize false light actions. There is a subtle difference in the way courts view the legal theories—false light cases are about damage to a person's personal feelings or dignity, whereas defamation is about damage to a person's ...