Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
High court and Supreme court had asked for the CBI inquiry in this case. [10] The case is currently being probed by CBI under the direction of Supreme Court, and CBI has filed a chargesheet. [1] This case is related to the larger Gurugram-Manesar IMT land scam case.
Court: Supreme Court of India: Full case name: Gurugram-Manesar Industrial Model Township land grab scam case : Case history; Prior action: CBI inquiry: Subsequent action: Further CBI inquiry: Court membership; Judges sitting: Adrash Kumar Goel and Udey Umesh Lalit, [1] Keywords; Political scams in India
On appeal to the Supreme Court, senior officials and owners of the Ryan International School were granted a bail order, and the Supreme Court described the proceedings against them as a 'media trial'. [46] Ryan International School management made a motion to the Supreme Court to transfer the case outside Haryana to ensure a fair trial. The ...
According to the Section 11 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPc), a Court of Judicial Magistrate of First Class may be established by the State Government in consultation with the High Court of the respective state at such places in the district and in any number by a notification. [1]
This case pertains to Hooda's alleged role for misusing his position as then Chief Minister of Haryana to cause wrongful gains to the Associated Journals Limited (AJL) and corresponding loss to the Government of Haryana, by illegally allotting a government plot of land worth several crores rupees (billions) to AJL for INR 59 lakh (5.9 million). [1]
DLF land grab case is a case related to 50 acre land grab in 2013 in Amipur village of Haryana during the Congress' Bhupinder Singh Hooda government, for which Robert Vadra, Hooda and DLF are being investigated by the CBI (c. December 2017).
On 7 December 2015, the Delhi High Court dismissed the appeals of Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi and five others which included Motilal Vora, Oscar Fernandes, Suman Dubey and Sam Pitroda, [39] and ordered them to appear in person before the trial court on 9 December. [40] The Delhi High Court in its 7 December 2015 judgment noted "criminal intent ...
It also has the authority to try cases punishable with imprisonment for a term not exceeding seven years and impose fines up to Rs. 10,000. The administrative head of the criminal courts in the judicial district is the Chief Judicial Magistrate. CJM Court has jurisdiction to hear appeals against the judgment of the Subordinate Magistrate courts.