enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Bruesewitz v. Wyeth - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruesewitz_v._Wyeth

    The Court, in a 6-2 opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia, held that the "plaintiffs design defect claims [were] expressly preempted by the Vaccine Act." Thus, the court affirmed laws that vaccine manufacturers are not liable for vaccine-induced injury or death if they are "accompanied by proper directions and warnings."

  3. Pfizer v Moderna COVID vaccine patents battle set to continue ...

    www.aol.com/news/uk-court-gives-mixed-ruling...

    LONDON (Reuters) -Pfizer and Moderna's legal battle over their rival COVID-19 vaccines looks set to continue after London's High Court gave a mixed ruling on two of Moderna's patents, likely ...

  4. Covid-19 vaccine patent legal battle heading to Court of Appeal

    www.aol.com/covid-19-vaccine-patent-legal...

    At Wednesday’s hearing, the same judge granted Pfizer and BioNTech permission to appeal against his EP949 decision, but refused Moderna permission to appeal against his ruling over the EP565 patent.

  5. National Federation of Independent Business v. Occupational ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Federation_of...

    Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 595 U.S. ___ (2022), is a Supreme Court of the United States case before the Court on an application for a stay of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's COVID-19 vaccination or test mandate. On January 13, 2022, the Supreme Court ordered a stay of the mandate. [1]

  6. Cedillo v. Secretary of Health and Human Services - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cedillo_v._Secretary_of...

    Michelle Cedillo v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, also known as Cedillo, was a court case involving the family of Michelle Cedillo, an autistic girl whose parents sued the United States government because they believed that her autism was caused by her receipt of both the measles-mumps-and-rubella vaccine (also known as the MMR vaccine) and thimerosal-containing vaccines.

  7. EU court criticises Commission over handling of COVID vaccine ...

    www.aol.com/news/eu-court-criticises-commission...

    Europe's second-highest court on Wednesday criticised the European Commission for a lack of transparency over COVID-19 vaccine contracts four years ago, a day before a key vote on Commission head ...

  8. Urgenda Foundation v State of the Netherlands - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urgenda_Foundation_v_State...

    The Dutch government appealed the ruling over multiple actions through 2018 to the Court of Appeals at the Hague. The state argued that the District Court's orders exceeded the trias politica, the Dutch's separation of powers, by creating environmental policy through its rulings.

  9. German appeals court denies claims against physician giving ...

    www.aol.com/news/german-appeals-court-denies...

    An appeals court in the German city of Stuttgart on Tuesday rejected damage claims against a physician who was accused of not warning of alleged harm from a COVID-19 vaccine she administered. The ...